Saturday, October 24, 2009
Essay
The emergence of new technologies such as non-linear editing software and video sharing websites has allowed the average computer user to produce and distribute film/video content which rivals that of professional practitioners. This has consequently led to a distinct rise in amateur filmmaking, with an increasing amount of short films and user-created content being made available to the world. This has yielded a number of benefits to the filmmaking community, however it also presents a variety of challenges to traditional filmmakers, whose work is being altered through the production of ‘fan films’ by internet users.
The proliferation of new digital technologies throughout the 1990’s and 2000’s has had a distinct effect on amateur filmmaking. As digital video cameras and editing software increased in quality and affordability, it allowed the average consumer to craft their own works by putting the tools of production into their hands, something which previously would not have been possible due to the cost and technical expertise required to use filmmaking equipment (Garrett 1997). It also spawned an effective method of distribution for such works, with the internet allowing for anyone to upload and share their creations with the online community (Veneruso 2003).
Indeed the internet was heralded as a vital tool to be exploited by filmmakers, as it broadened the potential audience of amateur works significantly (Thorburn & Jenkins 2004). Accordingly, this relatively new means for distributing content can be seen as providing a pathway through which amateur filmmakers can achieve greater recognition and success, as expressed by New York Times writer Marion Hart, who demonstrates the importance of the internet for sharing films: “The internet has the power to vault the best shorts and their directors out of film festival obscurity and onto your computer – and the computers of talent scouts searching for the next big thing” (Hart 2009).
This amateur filmmaking culture on the internet can be traced back to the unique subculture of ‘fan filmmaking’. Fan filmmaking involves the creation of new content from established source material, such as creating and shooting new stories involving the characters of a feature film, or editing sections of a film in such a way as to offer an original ‘spin’ on it (Gomez 2006). The internet facilitated such fan film production as it allowed for fans of a particular film or genre to converge around their shared interest in the subject matter, and thus offered a place where their creations may be shared and appreciated by like-minded people.
Kevin Rubio’s 1997 film Troops can perhaps be considered the earliest example of a truly successful internet-delivered short fan film. This ten minute video was a parody of the popular television show COPS, set amongst the universe created by the Star Wars film franchise. It is credited as being responsible for prompting the modern fan film movement, as it was one of the first such films to take advantage of the internet as a distribution method, and soon after its release, a number of websites dedicated specifically to showcasing fan films were established (DeRuvo 2002). The success and acclaim enjoyed by Troops illustrates the capability of the internet as an effective distribution method for such content, while also serving to highlight the benefits this means of sharing films provides. Prior to the release of this short, fan films were often overlooked by the professional filmmaking industry, however Star Wars creator George Lucas openly embraced Rubio’s homage-paying work (as evidenced in 2002 when the film was received the Pioneer Award at the inaugural Star Wars Fan Film Awards), eventually offering the independent director a professional position at Lucasfilm (Klinger 2006). Rubio’s achievements in this instance effectively gives further credence to the notion that the internet can act as a vehicle to benefit amateur filmmakers as it gives them the opportunity to establish themselves as filmmakers, and ultimately, get a foot in the door of Hollywood.
Although these new technologies have proved beneficial for amateur filmmakers, they have generated a variety of hurdles for the major film studios whose work is the inspiration for fan films. Most prominent among these issues is the perceived infringement on copyright that occurs when characters, storylines, and footage from particular films is used on websites and in fan films without the original author’s permission. Although technically this is a clear violation of copyright laws, many film producers (typically those of the science fiction genre as these types of films are most often the subject of fan films) have allowed the production of fan films based on their work, on the condition that the creators do not make a profit from them (Pavlik 2008).
Indeed studios have often struggled with this matter of allowing fans to rework their films, and as such have offered fans varying degrees of creative control. In some cases, it is evident that allowing fan films and fan communities to be established is advantageous in that it can help stir up interest in a particular film (generating more revenue for the producers), and regulating the activities of such a group too heavily is to be avoided as it may alienate the most loyal sector of their audience. Conversely, by affording fans too much creative freedom in appropriating their works they risk forfeiting rights to their intellectual property (Thompson & Bordwell 2003). This led to some professional filmmakers founding their own fan film sites where fans may interact with each other and upload videos they have filmed, while imposing restrictions on what content is suitable to be created.
Furthermore, due to the increasing quality of special effects and cinematography adopted by fan filmmakers, the line between the official product and user generated content is being blurred, as highlighted by Chris Albrecht (who oversaw the official star wars fan film competition) when he discussed the fan film ‘Star Wars: Revelations': “Up until the moment the actors spoke, you wouldn’t be able to tell whether that was a real Star Wars film or a fan creation because they special effects were so good...as the tools get better, there is bound to be confusion in the marketplace”(Jenkins 2006, p. 155). This highlights another issue faced by the studios in distinguishing their works as official, and supports the idea that some degree of regulation in fan filmmaking is needed.
It can be seen then that the development of digital technologies in the area of filmmaking has yielded benefits for both amateur and professional filmmakers. The arrival of these technologies has facilitated the proliferation of fan films, and although these have created a number of issues in how content is used and manipulated, fan films have ultimately proved to be beneficial for both amateur filmmakers, as they provide a way for amateurs to reach Hollywood, and the studios that produce feature films, by helping to create interest and expand the fan base of such productions.
References
DeRuvo, James 2002, Fan Films on the Web, http://www.videomaker.com/article/8947/
Garrett, Stephen 1997, Digital Filmmaking: The New Alternative?, http://www.indiewire.com/article/digital_filmmaking_the_new_alternative/
Gomez, Michael 2006, Fan Films, http://www.videomaker.com/article/12722/
Hart, Marion 2009, A Comeback for Short Films Is Linked to the Web, http://www.nytimes.com/2001/01/14/technology/14HART.html?pagewanted=1
Jenkins, Henry 2006, Convergence culture: where old and new media collide, NYU Press, New York.
Kilnger, Barbara 2006, Beyond the multiplex: cinema, new technologies, and the home, University of California Press, Los Angeles.
Pavlik, John Vernon 2008, Media in the digital age, Columbia University Press, New York.
Thompson, Kristin & Bordwell, David 2003, Film History: An Introduction, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Thorburn, David & Jenkins, Henry 2004, Rethinking media change: the aesthetics of transitionMedia in Transition, MIT Press, Cambridge.
Veneruso, Tara 2003, Filmmaking for New Technologies & the Internet, http://www.flamingangelfilms.com/handout.html
Friday, October 9, 2009
Week 10 Lecture
Thursday, October 8, 2009
Week 10 Task
Tuesday, October 6, 2009
Essay Topic
3. Digital media put the tools of production into the hands of the everyday computer user making it incredibly easy to produce content. These creative skills used to be something that people worked to develop. Now it appears that amateurs can produce content of a fair standard within a relatively short period of time. Where does this leave 'professionals' and highly-skilled artists? Choose one area of creativity and discuss some of the challenges facing practitioners vs amateurs in producing digitalcontent.
In response to this, I will explore how the rise of video sharing websites such as youtube and the availability of new software programs has impacted filmmakers, and allowed the average computer user to have their video content seen around the world.
I intend to explain the history behind destributing video over the internet, it's benefits as a distribution method, how this new means of sharing film/video has affected traditional filmmakers (including the proliferation of 'fan films'), what benefits digital filmmaking has over traditional filmmaking, among many other such questions.
Some sources I will use include http://www.flamingangelfilms.com/handout.html, which provides some information about the internet as a distribution method for films, as well as several links to online videos and video sharing sites. Another website which may be useful is this one, which is an article describing the benefits of digital filmmaking. This site provides an interesting interview with online filmmakers.
Tuesday, September 22, 2009
iReport
Week 8 Tutorial
The first such task was to sign an e-petition, so I chose to sign this one about preserving rainforests and protecting the environment.
I then went on to the task of discovering who my local state, and federal representatives are. Alex Douglas is the MP for Gaven and my local representative, Peter Lawlor is my state representative, and Steven Ciobo is the minister for Moncrieff and my federal representative.
The last time Alex Douglas spoke in parliament was on the 23 April 2009 about vegetation management, you can view the speech here.
Today Barack Obama addressed the United Nations General Assembly about his "ambitious sweep of his foreign policy" (source). The video of his speech is below.
Apparently the Australian government has proposed that "Clean Feed" be used by Australian internet service providers. The system has been used for some time in the UK, and filters out content on the web deemed to be 'obscene', effectively censoring the internet. Implementing such a system in Australia, however, seems to contradict the rights inherent in a democratic society, most notably the right to free speech. Although the censorship won't go to the extreme extent that has been seen in countries like China and North Korea, it still limits the freedoms expected by the public and should therefore be discouraged. Furthermore, according to http://nocleanfeed.com/ this will slow down internet access and would prove very costly to establish.
Sunday, September 13, 2009
Week 7 Lecture
One of the freeware applications which I have used for some time is Audacity, an audio editing and recording program which offers a wide variety of features, while remaining very user friendly.
Week 6 Lecture
Tuesday, September 1, 2009
Week 6 Tutorial
View Roadtrip in a larger map
Here is a map of a road trip I designed in Google Maps, it's quite the journey.
The website http://personas.media.mit.edu/personasWeb.html provides an interesting and somewhat artistic way of displaying search information, unfortunately though, it's not very accurate. This is what was it generated when I typed my name in:
www.sketchcast.com is a google-esque video sharing website, with all the videos featured being drawn by the contributors. Check http://www.sketchcast.com/view/MB7vBYR for my video (I didn't embed the video as for some reason it refuses to work in my blog).
Along with Sketch Cast, more and more creative spaces are emerging on the web, providing users with information presented through unique methods and new ways to interact with cyberspace. The following are just a few such websites.
http://generatorblog.blogspot.com/ highlights software which allows users to generate various personalised pictures, sayings, and even Phat Rap Names online.
"Mashable" is a "social media guide" which features websites that find niche uses for popular software/websites such as mapping filming locations of Doctor Who on Google Maps.
http://hisz.rsoe.hu/alertmap/index2.phpis an online map which displays current biological, natural, and other disasters occurring around the world. This provides an effective visual representation of information, making it easy to be comprehended by the user.
http://www.speedtest.net/index.php?nojs=1 is a useful tool in checking the speed of a computer's internet connection.
www.polyvore.com is an example of a site which combines elements of online shopping, social networking, and art to create something unique.
Sunday, August 30, 2009
Screen Shot Analysis
(Sorry about the subtitles in the screenshots by the way, it's not that easy to find good quality movie clips online for free)
The first shot of the movie (a Mid/Medium shot) fades in to reveal the main characters of the film (or the 'who'), played by Vince Vaughn and Owen Wilson.
Next a Medium Long Shot is used (along with the dialogue) to reveal that they are mediating a divorce, answering the question of 'what'.
Although it is not told explicitly to the audience, the 'when' can be determined by the decor of the scene and how the characters are dressed, as well as the dialogue of the characters. It is soon established that this is set in modern times, and during the day.
The 'where' of the scene can also be idetified from this shot, as the viewer can see that the scene takes place in an office, and a later Wide Shot/Establishing Shot reveals that they are in Washington D.C.
Although the 'why' of the scene isn't made as obvious through cinematography, a mid shot helps convey the anger of the wife and her hatred for her husband, showing the reason behind the divorce.
A big close up later in the film of the 'purple hearts' shows 'how' the two main characters plan on getting free drinks at the weddings they intend to crash.
Tuesday, August 25, 2009
Internet Delivered Short Films
OK Go had been a relatively obscure band until the release of their now famous video for the song "Here It Goes Again". Shortly after it's release, the video went viral and the band's popularity skyrocketed. This displays the capacity for the internet to share videos with the world, and highlights it's importance as a means of distribution.
OK Go - Here It Goes Again
http://www.funnyordie.com/ was founded by Will Ferrell and Adam McKay's production company in 2007. This website is unique in that it offers visitors a number of exclusive comdey videos from famous contributors such as Judd Apatow and Will Ferrell. It's establishment hence marks an important step in celebrities and producers (whose work would otherwise be reserved for the silver screen) recognising the internet as a powerful medium for distribution of original content.
Check out the site's first video, "The Landlord":
Sunday, August 23, 2009
Week 4 Lecture
Saturday, August 22, 2009
Internet Scavenger Hunt
2. What is the best way (quickest, most reliable) to contact Lilly Allen?
Ask Jeeves tells me that... "The term “glycome” describes the complete repertoire of glycans and glycoconjugates that cells produce under specified conditions of time, space, and environment. 'Glycomics,' therefore, refers to studies that profile the glycome."
Tuesday, August 18, 2009
Week 3 Lecture
Tuesday, August 11, 2009
Language of the Screen
ECU - Extreme Close Up - A shot wherein the subject fills the entire frame (Source)
WS - Wide Shot - A shot which displays a wide or panoramic view of the scene (Source)
MS - Mid/Medium Shot - A shot which is midway between a long shot and a close up (Source)
More info about these can be found here
Timeline of Computing and the Internet
- Charles Babbage's Difference Engine (designed to calculate and print mathematical tables) is developed in the 19th Century
- Ada Byron conceives the first computer program
- Alan Turing devises the first working computer, The Bombe, during World War 2 to break German Enigma codes
- The first generation of computers are made available by IBM in the 1950's. These large machines are adopted primarily for government, business, and military use
- The first PC (personal computer) is made available in 1975. Bill Gates writes a programming language known as BASIC, and soon starts his own business, Microsoft
- The Apple computer (the Apple 1) is developed in the 1970's, costing $666.60
- IBM and Microsoft produce an operating system DOS 1.0, and eventually this partnership dominates the personal computer market
- Linux is developed in 1991
- Apple sees something of a resurgence in 1998 with the return of Steve Jobs
This info was gathered here.
A detailed history of the computer can be found here.
Internet Time line
- In the 1960's the RAND corporation develops the idea of a communication, command and control network that could survive nuclear war
- The US Department of Defence funds a program which eventually produces ARPANET in the late 1960's
- The World-Wide-Web is developed in the 1990's which uses internetworking and hyper text to make an easy to use but powerful system.
- Internet browsers such as Mosaic and Netscape are developed in the early 90's
- Instant messaging, p2p file sharing, VoIP/voice chat, and social networking sites like myspace/facebook come to prominence in the 2000's.
Info obtained from this site
More info about the history of the computer/internet can be found here
Lecture 2 - The history of computing
"...I predict that within 100 years, computers will be twice as powerful, 10,000 times larger, and so expensive that only the five richest kings of Europe will own them."
Tuesday, August 4, 2009
Convergence Pics
Convergence Examples
These smartphones are a prime example of converging technology, as they serve as a camera, television, and computer...
Steve Jobs caused a revolution when he released the ever-popular iPod, allowing users to view pictures, listen to music, and watch movies on the go...
Another example of converging technologies is seen in the application of gps and computer sensors in cars that can park themselves...
Social networking sites such as Facebook, which allows users to share photos and communicate easily with other users, can perhaps be considered the most popular and influential of such technologies...
More info on social networking can be found here
Video of the self-parking car...